The Paradox of Disctinctions

Roy T Cook

Abstract


Drawing distinctions is a key tool of both mathematics and philosophy. In this essay I show that the unfettered drawing of distinctions leads to paradox.

References


bibitem[Anonymized(2013)]{Co13}

Anonymized Reference.

bibitem[Falmagne & Hass(2003)]{FH03}

Falmagne, R. & M. Hass (eds.) (2003), emph{Representing Reason: Feminist Theory and Formal Logic}, Rowman & Littlefield.

bibitem[Nye(1990)]{Ny90}

Nye, A. (1990), emph{Words of Power: A Feminist Reading of the History of Logic}, London: Routledge.

bibitem[Plumwood(1993)]{Pl93}

Plumwood, V. (1993), ``The Politics of Reason: Towards a Feminist Logic'', emph{Australasian Journal of Philosophy} 71(4): 436 -- 462, reprinted in cite{FH03}: 11 -- 44.

bibitem[Plumwood(2003)]{Pl03}

Plumwood, V. (2003), ``Feminism and the Logic of Alterity'', in cite{FH03}: 45 -- 70.

bibitem[Rayo & Uzquiano(2007)]{RU07}

Rayo, A. & G. Uzquiano (eds.) (2007), emph{Absolute Generality}, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

bibitem[Sokolowski(1979)]{So79}

Sokolowski, R. (1979), ``Making Distinctions'', emph{The Review of Metaphysics} 32(4): 639 -- 676.

bibitem[Sokolowski(1998)]{So98}

Sokolowski, R. (1998), ``The Method of Philosophy: Making Distinctions'', emph{The Review of Metaphysics} 51(3): 515 -- 532.

bibitem[Whitehead & Russell(1910)]{WR10}

Whitehead, A. & B. Russell (1910), emph{Principia Mathematica vol. I}, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.